CNHL 2200mAh 3S Lipo Battery 30C 11.1V lipo Battery with XT60 Plug for RC Airplane Car Truggy Truck Crawler(2 Packs)

these lipos are so good. The listing says 30c but they came 40c. Not complaining. Very happy buy. when charging at 2c they go from empty to fully charged in just under 30 minutes.

These are great! They last as long as the battery’s that came with the RC car. I’d recommend these to everyone. Shipped fast and they are packaged well to ensure no damage during shipping.

Good

Good price

Perfect fit for my Arrma Mojave Grom! May have to change the connectors,still worth the price.

These are good packs, IR is good, balance charge great, and have every bit of the 2200 mAh capacity. I get upwards of an hour run time on my brushless crawlers. They've got plenty of punch too when needed.

Batteries are smaller in size than I thought which is perfect for my application in my crawler and it give a better punch and more wheel speed than 2s with an 80c ratting great bang for the buck

The capacity of these is way overstated. This is the initial review but will be adjusted if customer service is helpful. I guess it's possible I just got 2 bad batteries, but that is unlikely in my opinion. For clarity, these are for my RC airplane so capacity is of the utmost importance. It determines flight time and why people will put as large a battery as the plane will hold. It's important. I compared the CNHL to the 2 new Ovonic batteries that I have and the CNHL are nowhere near 2200 mAh. I had already noticed an oddity. They charged MUCH faster to full capacity than the Ovonic batteries, unusually fast. So it was time for a test. For the first test, I discharged one Ovonic and one CNHL to the exact same level, 3.70 volts. I then charged both and noted the mAh that each used to get to 4.2v. The Ovonic took in 1874 mAh to get to full capacity while he CNHL was 1347 mAh. To rule out the possibility that it was specific to that one CNHL battery, I did the same exact thing with 2 other new batteries that I have, again another Ovonic and the other CNHL. For this test, I did the same thing discharging each to identical voltage, 3.70 v. This time, the Ovonic took in 1913 mAh while the CNHL could only hold 1305 mAh. I'm not sure exactly what the end mAh rating would be for these, but it is most definitely much less than the 2200 mAh that it says they are. It is possible these are only 1600-1700 mAh. This will mean much less flying time for my planes. Again, I will update once I reach out to customer service. I'm not a fan of not getting what I paid for.