






Desertcart purchases this item on your behalf and handles shipping, customs, and support to France.
๐ Elevate your wellness game โ donโt just weigh yourself, know yourself.
The FITINDEX Smart Body Composition Scale combines advanced 8-electrode BIA technology with a sleek design and a powerful app to deliver over 50 detailed body metrics. It supports multiple users, offers segmental muscle and fat analysis, and syncs with popular health platforms, making it the ultimate tool for millennials who demand precision, personalization, and progress tracking in their fitness routine.






| ASIN | B0FDKDCFBB |
| Best Sellers Rank | #52,163 in Health & Household ( See Top 100 in Health & Household ) #73 in Digital Bathroom Scales |
| Brand | FITINDEX |
| Brand Name | FITINDEX |
| Color | Gray |
| Customer Reviews | 4.5 out of 5 stars 6,362 Reviews |
| Display Type | LED |
| Form Factor | floor scale |
| Included Components | scale, user manual |
| Item Highlight | Smart Scale for Body Weight, Digital Scale with BMI, Fat, Muscle Mass, Segmental Muscle Analysis, FSA Eligible HSA |
| Manufacturer | FITINDEX |
| Measurement Type | Digital |
| Model | F-MSC01 |
| Part Number | F-MSC01 |
| Readout Accuracy | 3.2 ounces |
| Recommended Uses For Product | Adults |
| Special Feature | Body Fat, Body Mass Index, Body Analysis, Bodyweight, Bone Mass, Muscle Mas, Smart Unlimited Users |
| Special Features | Body Fat, Body Mass Index, Body Analysis, Bodyweight, Bone Mass, Muscle Mas, Smart Unlimited Users |
| Unit Count | 1 Count |
| Weigh Scale Type | Floor Scale |
| Weight Capacity Maximum | 180 kg |
| Weight Limit | 180 kg |
S**N
My New Favorite Fitness Tool!
I absolutely love this smart scale! It does so much more than just show your weight. I love being able to track my body progress and see different measurements that help me stay motivated on my fitness journey. The setup was easy, and the app connects quickly and keeps all my information organized. The design is sleek, modern, and it feels like a high-quality product. I love that it helps me focus on my overall health and progress instead of just one number on the scale. This is perfect for anyone trying to stay accountable, improve their wellness routine, or track changes over time. Definitely worth the purchase!
J**N
Great fitness addition
This high quality device has helped to keep track of multiple different systems that I had no way of knowing. Auto connectivity to phone and made of quality materiala. The display is exceptionally readable.
M**Z
Worth it
Very accurate scale, good quality, one of the best scales I owned so far
D**.
Miss my Fitindex scale!!
I loved this scale, I would check my weight and other measurements once per week. Looking forward to the progress I made. Until the censor plate came off of the right hand bar. I thought to myself maybe I can just glue it back. Underneath there were wires I was advised to just send it back . I really want to order another one, jeez knowing that the handles are lightly glued to the bar I am hesitant to.
J**S
Scale and app are easy to use
This scale is truly smart. The body composition feature works and is so helpful as I am reshaping my body in my latter years. The app is a great compliment to the scale and provides. Alia La information. My dietician recommended this and Iโm glad I got it.
A**B
Lots of information given.
This weight scale is awesome! It records everything. I donโt know how it does what it does. I put my thumbs and hand on the bars and it does its thing. Very informative and good value for the money. One thing to know, the app must be open for it to record your data. After it records data, I have to take a picture of it because I cannot zoom in on that screen but that doesnโt bother me. The app has a lot of good information!
J**S
Great scale
Easy to use and a great way to track progress.
T**D
Comparing 2 scales to a DEXA
I got the Run Star Smart Scale and the Fit Index Smart Scale - both of them in the 8 electrode models with the handle bars, as an upgrade to my previous 4 electrode Fit Index Smart Scale. I had them both arrive by the day I was getting a DEXA scan so that I could compare their accuracy. Here are my key takeaways: - Nothing replicates a DEXA scan at home, which I already suspected, but I do think smart scales have a place for tracking trends in-between less frequent DEXA scans. - There is a huge difference between a 4 electrode model and an 8 electrode model. My numbers changed SUBSTANTIALLY when upgrading from 4 to 8 electrodes, both from FITINDEX. The new 8 electrode scale compared to my old data with the 4 electrode version and it was so different, the scale verified I was even the same person!!! Multiple categoriesโ classifications were changed (as in- good/bad status changed) with the new info. So really, if you want a smart scale, I think thereโs no point to get one if itโs not an 8 electrode one. ๐ณ - The numbers between the two new (8 electrode) scales were close-ish to each other, but both were a little bit further from the DEXA number than Iโd like. For example, in most categories the 2 scales were within 1-2 points/percent of each other, but were 6-7 points/percent off of the correct DEXA number. This was the case with Body Fat Percentage (6% off), Body Fat Mass (7% off), and lean muscle mass (9lbs off if Iโm comparing the right numbers). - I couldnโt verify everything because some categories (like visceral fat) they use an entirely different ranking system that doesnโt compare to DEXA. Other categories (like water, muscle rate/percentage, bone mass) were not included on DEXA or I was unable to locate them. DEXA also didnโt give me a protein level, but bloodwork from a couple months ago indicated it was โgoodโ, and so did both scales. Again the rankings used were different and didnโt compare, because the scales said 11.7 & 12.4% but bloodwork said 7.1. (not a percentage). But as both put me in โnormalโ range I figure itโs still in the close-ish category. - DEXA reports are way more annoying to try to decipher and figure out what they mean. The reports given from both scales are way more user-friendly. That said, I found the Run Star scale to be slightly more user-friendly. Its advantages included marking โbadโ rankings in red (not just yellow/orange), making them easier to spot and obviously โbad.โ Also the body images themselves are color-coded by limb/area, making it quick to see whatโs โgoodโ or โbadโ instead of having a gray body image and having subtle color-coded word explanations to the side. - The biggest advantage I found to the Run Star scale was that they had better, more thorough explanations for each category than the Fit Index did. Where Fit Index may give a one-sentence explanation of what something is, the Run Star would tell you more about it, as well as giving a lengthier explanation of what to do to improve this number if yours is bad. I appreciate that! - Overall, Fit Index is a much less expensive scale, and most of its numbers/readings are pretty comparable to Run Star, but it doesnโt give you the extra info about each score or how to improve it, and itโs color coding is just a bit more subtle. I prefer the red to stand out as bad so I donโt have to hunt for it between similar intensity colors, none of which really stand out. So really the things I donโt like about Fit Index could be fixed with an app update, should the company choose to do so. Fit Index, if youโre reading this, if you update your app, send me a scale & Iโll update this review! ๐ - The main thing that stood out between the two scales as being significantly wrong is the fact that their Subcutaneous fat numbers were so far apart. Most ratings were very close to each other, but this category had an 8% difference! I wish I was able to know which one was more accurate, since that would have been my deciding factor. Unfortunately the DEXA scan I got didnโt give me that number so I donโt know the winner/loser in that category. Most other categories were within 1 point/percent of each other, though neither was right on target, so I considered the scales comparable to each other but not a replacement for DEXA. The only other categories that were further than 1 point/percent apart between the two scales were basal metabolic rate, metabolic age (2 points/years difference, so still pretty close), and waist-to-hip ratio (.18 off, which is a lot when the numbers are 1 or less!) - Since I donโt know which one was right/wrong on the subcutaneous fat score (the only notably different score between the 2 scales), I chose which scale to keep based on my preference for Run Star scaleโs app. I preferred its readability and color coding and appreciated their lengthier explanations of each rating. Itโs a bummer because my old data is saved in the Fit Index scale app already, but I just really like having the extra info there. So Iโm keeping the pricier one of the two. But if you want to save money I think Fit Index is a comparable scale at a lower price point. I just donโt know which one was so far off on the one ranking of subcutaneous fat.
L**C
Excelente calidad va precio
Muy buena, fรกcil se usar muy exacta y la conexiรณn Bluetooth es muy sencilla, excelente calidad precio vs similares, diseรฑo muy bonito y sobretodo funcional
B**A
use full product ๐๐ป
Full body information / easily connect to mobile n personal details in mobile / no usage paper
S**N
Scale
Works awesome
A**A
Excelente producto
Se sincroniza a la app de celular, puede almacenar mas de un usuario, fรกcil de usar.
A**A
Util
Bien
Trustpilot
3 weeks ago
2 weeks ago